Sunday, April 3, 2016

Freedom, Rights and Technology

Free and open source software is provided at zero cost but the word "free" does not refer to the cost of the software. "Free" refers to the fact that everyone has freedom to use the software for their benefit. The freedom to use, study, copy, modify, distribute are granted to everyone and is protected through an enforceable legal license.

When I first heard the free software concept I thought the idea was ridiculous. In a society where competition is fierce and virtually everything is for sale, I wondered why anyone would give away the intellectual ownership for their software. This is why the existence of billions of dollars of public domain software seems unbelievable. However, free software is not only available; it is maintained, updated and supported at no cost.

Why?

The stated goal of the free software movement is to protect the freedom and liberty of the individual. The theory is that computing controls so much of our lives that to control technology is to control access to rights such as privacy, free speech and self-defence.

"As our society grows more dependent on computers, the software we run is of critical importance to securing the future of a free society. Free software is about having control over the technology we use in our homes, schools and businesses, where computers work for our individual and communal benefit" Free Software Foundation

Free software advocates argue that in a computer dependent society we cannot protect our basic freedoms without control of technology. The goal of the free software license is to ensure that everyone has commercial and creative rights to that software.  The primary restrictions for free software licenses have the goal of ensuring that neither the software nor its derivatives become non-free.

Free software advocates also argue that visibility and cooperative development improve the quality of products and enhance the advancement of technology. They believe that increasing the size of the group that understands and has access to software increases the opportunity for innovation and error detection.

The evidence of the last 30 years supports the success of the free software methodology and philosophy. The existence and scope of free software has continued to grow and it is utilized globally for some of the most mission critical applications. Free software is a dominate technology for the internet and powers everything from android phones to nuclear submarines.  The value of free software is estimated in the billions and it generates billions in revenues annually for hardware, support and consulting services.

Society has and continues to benefit greatly from free software. It has produced jobs and is the foundation technology for many of the most important online services that we utilize every day. More importantly, the software continues to be owned by everyone and continues to offer tremendous opportunity for personal and societal gain.

The open source story is one of great accomplishment in practical terms. It includes the creation of innovative technical products, services and frameworks as well as substantial and long term economic impact and opportunity. However, the most impressive aspect of open source is the example that it provides for paradigm change.

The free software movement rightly recognizes that control is needed to maintain freedom and liberty. It is also correct in understanding that changing technology dictates changes in our thinking in order to maintain our core values. Software, gun control and with the allocation of wealth in society are a few among many areas where technology changes may modify long held positions.

Because of technology changes the right to “keep” and bear arms does not mean what it once did and the definition may continue to change as weapons like hand held "nukes" could become a reality. Society must adjust and that adjustment will sometimes require reorientation or our priorities.

The free software movement provides concrete evidence that with the right mindset and framework, individuals working together can protect their freedom and create the economic impact needed to provide them with control.

The model starts with the idea of collective ownership and protection for things needed to guarantee our rights and freedom. In the case of software that meant protecting the rights to use, access, share and modify the software. To protect our personal freedom we must control enough resources to provide everyone with sustenance and freedom of opinion and expression.

The model provided by open source may not translate perfectly for all situations where we need to protect our rights but there should be something to gain for considering a successful model. Protecting our rights to life and liberty (in general) is not necessarily the same as protecting the rights to software but there are relevant analogies in terms of issues and concepts. In both situations, society needs to make adjustments to protect human rights and ensure that control remains in the hands of the people.

The history and success of open source shows us that small adjustments can have major impacts. It demonstrates that putting the collective rights first does not require the destruction of competition, loss of innovation or the elimination of profit. To the contrary, the evidence supports the opposite position. Free software is of the highest quality, extremely innovative and is increasing its use and market share for critical services in governments, businesses and major institutions globally.

The capability to learn, use and profit from free software provides an unparalleled opportunity for anyone that chooses to leverage it. More people need to understand the free software philosophy and the economic opportunity provided by free software.

The foundation of the free software philosophy and movement is a world view. This is the belief that the right path for society is to share knowledge and work together to ensure freedom and prosperity. However, that freedom requires control. Those who believe and contribute to the free software movement are not fighting against anything or anyone. They believe in a concept and are active participants in a community that builds, shares, learns, teaches and leverage.

There is a lot to learn from the free software movement and philosophy. The problems, solutions and history have significance and application beyond software. The opportunity provided by free software should not be ignored. Neither should the philosophy.

Free and open source software is provided at zero cost but the word "free" does not refer to the cost of the software. "Free" refers to the fact that everyone has freedom to use the software for their benefit. The freedom to use, study, copy, modify, distribute are granted to everyone and is protected through an enforceable legal license.
When I first heard the free software concept I thought the idea was ridiculous. In a society where competition is fierce and virtually everything is for sale, I wondered why anyone would give away the intellectual ownership for their software. This is why the existence of billions of dollars of public domain software seems unbelievable. However, free software is not only available; it is maintained, updated and supported at no cost.
Why?
The stated goal of the free software movement is to protect the freedom and liberty of the individual. The theory is that computing controls so much of our lives that to control technology is to control access to rights such as privacy, free speech and self-defense.
"As our society grows more dependent on computers, the software we run is of critical importance to securing the future of a free society. Free software is about having control over the technology we use in our homes, schools and businesses, where computers work for our individual and communal benefit" Free Software Foundation
Free software advocates argue that in a computer dependent society we cannot protect our basic freedoms without control of technology. The goal of the free software license is to ensure that everyone has commercial and creative rights to that software.  The primary restrictions for free software licenses have the goal of ensuring that neither the software nor its derivatives become non-free.
Free software advocates also argue that visibility and cooperative development improve the quality of products and enhance the advancement of technology. They believe that increasing the size of the group that understands and has access to software increases the opportunity for innovation and error detection.
The evidence of the last 30 years supports the success of the free software methodology and philosophy. The existence and scope of free software has continued to grow and it is utilized globally for some of the most mission critical applications. Free software is a dominate technology for the internet and powers everything from android phones to nuclear submarines.  The value of free software is estimated in the billions and it generates billions in revenues annually for hardware, support and consulting services.
Society has and continues to benefit greatly from free software. It has produced jobs and is the foundation technology for many of the most important online services that we utilize every day. More importantly, the software continues to be owned by everyone and continues to offer tremendous opportunity for personal and societal gain.
The open source story is one of great accomplishment in practical terms. It includes the creation of innovative technical products, services and frameworks as well as substantial and long term economic impact and opportunity. However, the most impressive aspect of open source is the example that it provides for paradigm change.
The free software movement rightly recognizes that control is needed to maintain freedom and liberty. It is also correct in understanding that changing technology dictates changes in our thinking in order to maintain our core values. Software, gun control and with the allocation of wealth in society are a few among many areas where technology changes may modify long held positions.
Because of technology changes the right to “keep” and bear arms does not mean what it once did and the definition may continue to change as weapons like hand held "nukes" could become a reality. Society must adjust and that adjustment will sometimes require reorientation or our priorities.
The free software movement provides concrete evidence that with the right mindset and framework, individuals working together can protect their freedom and create the economic impact needed to provide them with control.
The model starts with the idea of collective ownership and protection for things needed to guarantee our rights and freedom. In the case of software that meant protecting the rights to use, access, share and modify the software. To protect our personal freedom we must control enough resources to provide everyone with sustenance and freedom of opinion and expression.
The model provided by open source may not translate perfectly for all situations where we need to protect our rights but there should be something to gain for considering a successful model. Protecting our rights to life and liberty (in general) is not necessarily the same as protecting the rights to software but there are relevant analogies in terms of issues and concepts. In both situations, society needs to make adjustments to protect human rights and ensure that control remains in the hands of the people.
The history and success of open source shows us that small adjustments can have major impacts. It demonstrates that putting the collective rights first does not require the destruction of competition, loss of innovation or the elimination of profit. To the contrary, the evidence supports the opposite position. Free software is of the highest quality, extremely innovative and is increasing its use and market share for critical services in governments, businesses and major institutions globally.
The capability to learn, use and profit from free software provides an unparalleled opportunity for anyone that chooses to leverage it. More people need to understand the free software philosophy and the economic opportunity provided by free software.
The foundation of the free software philosophy and movement is a world view. This is the belief that the right path for society is to share knowledge and work together to ensure freedom and prosperity. However, that freedom requires control. Those who believe and contribute to the free software movement are not fighting against anything or anyone. They believe in a concept and are active participants in a community that builds, shares, learns, teaches and leverage.
There is a lot to learn from the free software movement and philosophy. The problems, solutions and history have significance and application beyond software. The opportunity provided by free software should not be ignored. Neither should the philosophy.
- See more at: http://philosophytalk.org/comment/17237#comment-17237
Free and open source software is provided at zero cost but the word "free" does not refer to the cost of the software. "Free" refers to the fact that everyone has freedom to use the software for their benefit. The freedom to use, study, copy, modify, distribute are granted to everyone and is protected through an enforceable legal license.
When I first heard the free software concept I thought the idea was ridiculous. In a society where competition is fierce and virtually everything is for sale, I wondered why anyone would give away the intellectual ownership for their software. This is why the existence of billions of dollars of public domain software seems unbelievable. However, free software is not only available; it is maintained, updated and supported at no cost.
Why?
The stated goal of the free software movement is to protect the freedom and liberty of the individual. The theory is that computing controls so much of our lives that to control technology is to control access to rights such as privacy, free speech and self-defense.
"As our society grows more dependent on computers, the software we run is of critical importance to securing the future of a free society. Free software is about having control over the technology we use in our homes, schools and businesses, where computers work for our individual and communal benefit" Free Software Foundation
Free software advocates argue that in a computer dependent society we cannot protect our basic freedoms without control of technology. The goal of the free software license is to ensure that everyone has commercial and creative rights to that software.  The primary restrictions for free software licenses have the goal of ensuring that neither the software nor its derivatives become non-free.
Free software advocates also argue that visibility and cooperative development improve the quality of products and enhance the advancement of technology. They believe that increasing the size of the group that understands and has access to software increases the opportunity for innovation and error detection.
The evidence of the last 30 years supports the success of the free software methodology and philosophy. The existence and scope of free software has continued to grow and it is utilized globally for some of the most mission critical applications. Free software is a dominate technology for the internet and powers everything from android phones to nuclear submarines.  The value of free software is estimated in the billions and it generates billions in revenues annually for hardware, support and consulting services.
Society has and continues to benefit greatly from free software. It has produced jobs and is the foundation technology for many of the most important online services that we utilize every day. More importantly, the software continues to be owned by everyone and continues to offer tremendous opportunity for personal and societal gain.
The open source story is one of great accomplishment in practical terms. It includes the creation of innovative technical products, services and frameworks as well as substantial and long term economic impact and opportunity. However, the most impressive aspect of open source is the example that it provides for paradigm change.
The free software movement rightly recognizes that control is needed to maintain freedom and liberty. It is also correct in understanding that changing technology dictates changes in our thinking in order to maintain our core values. Software, gun control and with the allocation of wealth in society are a few among many areas where technology changes may modify long held positions.
Because of technology changes the right to “keep” and bear arms does not mean what it once did and the definition may continue to change as weapons like hand held "nukes" could become a reality. Society must adjust and that adjustment will sometimes require reorientation or our priorities.
The free software movement provides concrete evidence that with the right mindset and framework, individuals working together can protect their freedom and create the economic impact needed to provide them with control.
The model starts with the idea of collective ownership and protection for things needed to guarantee our rights and freedom. In the case of software that meant protecting the rights to use, access, share and modify the software. To protect our personal freedom we must control enough resources to provide everyone with sustenance and freedom of opinion and expression.
The model provided by open source may not translate perfectly for all situations where we need to protect our rights but there should be something to gain for considering a successful model. Protecting our rights to life and liberty (in general) is not necessarily the same as protecting the rights to software but there are relevant analogies in terms of issues and concepts. In both situations, society needs to make adjustments to protect human rights and ensure that control remains in the hands of the people.
The history and success of open source shows us that small adjustments can have major impacts. It demonstrates that putting the collective rights first does not require the destruction of competition, loss of innovation or the elimination of profit. To the contrary, the evidence supports the opposite position. Free software is of the highest quality, extremely innovative and is increasing its use and market share for critical services in governments, businesses and major institutions globally.
The capability to learn, use and profit from free software provides an unparalleled opportunity for anyone that chooses to leverage it. More people need to understand the free software philosophy and the economic opportunity provided by free software.
The foundation of the free software philosophy and movement is a world view. This is the belief that the right path for society is to share knowledge and work together to ensure freedom and prosperity. However, that freedom requires control. Those who believe and contribute to the free software movement are not fighting against anything or anyone. They believe in a concept and are active participants in a community that builds, shares, learns, teaches and leverage.
There is a lot to learn from the free software movement and philosophy. The problems, solutions and history have significance and application beyond software. The opportunity provided by free software should not be ignored. Neither should the philosophy.

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

Why free software is important!

"As our society grows more dependent on computers, the software we run is of critical importance to securing the future of a free society. Free software is about having control over the technology we use in our homes, schools and businesses, where computers work for our individual and communal benefit"   Free Software Foundation
Free software is software that grants everyone permission to use, study, copy, modify and/or distribute the software.
Free and open source software are provided at zero cost but the word "free" does not refer to the cost of the software. "Free" refers to the fact that everyone has freedom to use the software for their benefit. These freedoms (use, study, copy, modify, distribute) are granted to everyone and are protected through an enforceable legal license.
A Free Software license ensures that the public has commercial and creative rights to that software. The commercial and creative rights include the rights to reproduce, modify and sell the software. Typically, the only restrictions for free software licenses have the goal of ensuring that neither the software nor its derivatives become non-free. This means that non-free software cannot include free software and that no one has the right to restrict the freedoms granted by the free software licenses. There are many different free software licenses but all "free software licenses" provide and protect the same rights.
The Free Software Foundation is a non-profit organization that promotes the development of free software and documentation. Their mission is to defend the rights of all free software users. Their view is that software must be free to ensure society does not lose control over its computing.
The 4 basic freedoms are defined as follows:
The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0) .
The freedom to study how the program works, and adapt it to your needs (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.
The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2).
The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Access to the source code is a precondition for this.

Open Source

The term open source came into use in the late 90s as a re-branding of the free software movement. Some members of the free software movement wanted to refocus the dialogue on free software toward its commercial value. They prioritized the technical and economic benefits of open source code and open development, and avoided the political and moral issues that had been a focus of the "Free Software" movement. The goal was to increase participation from the commercial software industry.
The term FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) is often used to acknowledge both movements and perspectives. The primary differences between the free software and open source licenses are the values upon which the licenses are based. Despite the differences in priority and/or focus all "Free Software" is open source and almost all software that is acknowledged by the Open Source Initiative is also Free Software.

Better Software

One of the goals of free and open source software is to improve the quality of software. When software is proprietary only the vendor with access to that software has the capabilities to repair and/or enhance it. Changes to the software are dependent upon the skills and/or desires of the vendor.
With open source there is a community that is able to fix and improve the software. This increases the potential for fixes and enhancements and ensures that profit is not the only motive behind modifications. Software is enhanced or modified based on the needs and skills of the community. The priority for the development of the software becomes what is needed and not what is profitable.

Protection of Liberty

A primary motivation for open source is to ensure that personal liberty is maintained. Visibility into what software does and how it works is necessary to ensure that software is performing as it should and has no unwanted functionality. With free software the access to source code provides the opportunity to validate the functionality and change it if needed.

Software Evolution

Many believe that the best path to developing computing technology is to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to access and contribute to it. By making source code visible it is possible for developers to learn from each other and to leverage the work of others to develop or improve products.
There is little doubt that having access to the source code for all Linux applications can be of great value to developers writing new applications or services. There is the potential to save countless hours writing code by using and/or modifying code that was written for other purposes.
The cooperative model where people share and work together on projects is more effective than the closed proprietary model. At a minimum the cooperative model should improve efficiency by reducing duplication of effort, at best working as a team will improve everyone's performance.

Economic benefits

Technology and non-technology companies have embraced open source and accepted it as a way companies can share development costs. Technology companies such as Novell, Red Hat, IBM and HP use, develop and contribute to open source software. This decreases their costs for those common components that they all share and use. It also allows them to use some capabilities without any development or software costs.
Many large and successful companies such as web hosting and online service companies utilize open source almost exclusively to deliver their services. They utilize Linux servers, Apache, Wordpress and countless other open source tools as components of their core services.
These companies and the clients they service generate jobs and revenues in the billions. With more than 50% of all websites hosted on Linux the economic impact of open source on the internet alone is significant. However, the utilization extends beyond the internet and includes government, science, education, business and home use.

Possibilities

Open source makes it possible for everyone to have access to advanced computing technology at a low cost. It protects our freedom by allowing us to control the software that we use. It also provides the opportunity to learn and provides a frame work to execute and develop applications and services.